Sunday, December 26, 2010

WIKILEAKS / Daily Record readers SLAM the McCanns and pros leap in to defend

hajduk wrote:
So now it seems as though a *British* police report by Lee Rainbow highlighted suspicions against the McCanns, and of course it was a *British* police adviser, Mark Harrison, who first suggested the parents had to be looked at, it was a *British* top dog handler, Martin Grime and his two springer spaniels who apparently alerted to the scent of a corpse in the McCanns' apartment. It wasn't all the fault of that 'disgraced', incompetent Portuguese detective, then? No wonder the McCanns are reported to be 'furious'.
19/12/2010 3:00 PM GMT on
User Image
santaclaus1 wrote:
So after reading this, will Kate and Gerry now persecute the British Police and sue them for hindering the search for their daughter?
19/12/2010 3:27 PM GMT on
User Image
JusticeJones wrote:
I'm lost I thought everyone knew the British police were totally involved from the beginning! I think the people who hindered the search the most was the very people who refused to work with the UK and Portuguese police that being the Mccanns themselves, refused to answer questions and do a reconstruction. Yet they use the limited company funds set up on behalf of Madeleine to sue/silence anyone who thinks this is suspect, strange world we live in.
One day you will get justice Madeleine, people like those behind the Wikileaks are speaking on your behalf. RIP little one.
19/12/2010 6:01 PM GMT on
User Image
JusticeJones wrote:
"Those who could help Madeleine but choose to do nothing are also complicit in this injustice"....Mr Gerald McCann.

Wonder what Madeleine would have thought when you and your wife chose not to answer the questions put to you by the police? When you chose not to hold a reconstruction. Doing nothing Mr & McCann I'd say, injustice you bet.
19/12/2010 6:05 PM GMT on
User Image
Rosiepops wrote:
I am ashamed to admit I supported the McCanns believing absolutely their claims of abduction but lately with the expected release of their forthcoming book to achieve no other ends but make money and now this information from wikileaks I am beginning to have my doubts regarding the veracity of their claims and I am not the only one among my friends. The veil is starting to be lifted and I'm afraid I do not like what is being revealed about the McCanns.
19/12/2010 6:48 PM GMT on
User Image
Principles wrote:
Weren't the British police involved anyway? Everyone knows they brought the dogs and the FSS did the forensic tests. I'm puzzled.

How does all this square with Amaral saying the British embassy/Government/police/uncle Tom Cobley and all were working FOR the McCanns and against him? I'm puzzled.

Of course the British police co-operated with the Portuguese. Why wouldn't they? Of course the parents were, correctly, the first suspects. BUT then the tests proved that there was no evidence against the McCanns didn't they? I'm puzzled.

I don't understand the big fuss about this Wikleaks stuff. Apart from showing that Amaral's accusations against the British police were wrong, which everyone knew anyway, what's new?
19/12/2010 6:56 PM GMT on
User Image
JusticeJones wrote:
Some people take longer to see the truth than others Rosiepops. I applaud your honesty. On a seperate front why would the mccanns need the offer of a substancial book deal to be honest. Similarly why would they need money to look for Madeleine if instead of ordering a review of the evidence (which is nothing other than a publicity stunt) rather than the re-opening of the process with full co-operation from them re the answers or reconstruction.
God bless wikileaks.
19/12/2010 7:01 PM GMT on
User Image
JusticeJones wrote:
Principles you need to emerge yourself in the case of the McCanns might sort out your apparent confusion.
The parents are still suspects, the case does not have enough evidence to proceed to Court, hence it is shelved. The Portuguese asked for Madeleine's medical records - denied. They asked for the McCanns statements - denied. The FSS have lost samples - True. They tried to get the UK police to pass on other information which was denied.
You misread the Wikileaks (as you might if you were one of the paid employees of the McCanns many PR companies), the UK POLICE DEVELOPED EVIDENCE. Comprende? Not suspected or thought but evidence aka the stuff that gets people put away for a long time.
Finally no not everyone thought the UK police were involved, the Mccanns passed them off as mere co-ordinators and Clarence Mitchell repeated this to slur the Portuguese. When Mr Amaral stood in Court the UK police denied their co-operation, you get it now?
Merry Christmas pal and happy reading.
19/12/2010 7:11 PM GMT on
User Image
JusticeJones wrote:
I wonder if those that have pre-ordered the Mccanns new book, (which according to the Aunt is honest! and scathing of the Portuguese), will have a bit of a wait a bit longer for their book to arrive now. I also wonder what kind of a Christmas the publishers will have now it turns out that the UK were the driving force behind all this all along...hmmmm. Shelved (like the matter) or amended to libel the UK police, decisions, decisions.....!
19/12/2010 7:55 PM GMT on
User Image
justforinfo wrote:
Readers and editors, as well as administrators, should know that the messages here against the Mccann family have not arrived here by chance. The Chairman of the so-called 'Madeleine Foundation', Tony Bennett, helps to run a particularly vile and mean-spirited little forum, where he posted the link to this article and urged his supporters to spam it with negative comment.

This truly horrible individual, still the subject of an undertaking given to the High Court in England to get the hell off the McCanns' back and stop libelling them, has celebrated previous Chistmases by desecrating a much-loved Carol. replacing the words with a vile anti-Mccann ditty of his own invention. And this man claims to be an ardent Christian.
The McCanns were cleared by the Portuguese prosecutor and continue to search for their daughter. Others meanwhile find meaning in their own empty lives by persecuting the parents of a missing child and circulating comments made on media sites such as this as 'proof' they are representative of public opnion.