Wednesday, May 2, 2012

'Loving' Mom Put Bleach Into Her Toddlers Eyes !

Authorities say a Washington mother repeatedly put bleach into her toddler daughter's eyes, causing permanent vision loss in child's right eye, Q13 Fox reports.

29-year-old Jennifer Mothershead pled not guilty to charges of first-degree child assault Monday.

Authorities say Mothershead was given antibiotics and eye drops in March 2011 for her toddler daughter after the child came to a local hospital with an eye issue. Mothershead told doctors her daughter had scratched her eye while playing in a barn, according to Q13 Fox.

Authorities claim Mothershead's then-14-month-old daughter was airlifted to the hospital with a serious head injury in May 2011. Authorities grew concerned when Mothershead reportedly had no explanation for what had happened.

While examining the girl, doctors noticed the child's eye infection had gotten worse. Mothershead told doctors her child's eyes had been swollen shut for a month, according to Q13 Fox.
She said her daughter was sleeping 20-22 hours a day because she could not tolerate exposure to sunlight due to her eye pain. 
Pierce County Sheriff's Department spokesman Ed Troyer told Q13 Fox investigators decided to look into the case in part because they felt Mothershead showed little concern for her child. When they examined the eye drops Mothershead allegedly had given to her daughter, one detective said the drops caused a burning sensation when he tested them on his wrist.

"We found one of the eye drop bottles of chemicals, which basically burned our detectives," Pierce County Sheriff's Department spokesman Ed Troyer told Q13 Fox.  "It obviously wasn’t something that should be going in someone’s eyes."

Investigators sent the drops to the Food and Drug Administration's Forensic Chemistry Lab for analysis. The lab determined the drops contained bleach.

"The staff at Harborview determined that the damage to the child's eyes was consistent with repeated exposure to bleach, and ruled out any possibility that the eye dropper had been merely cleaned with bleach," the prosecutor's office said in a statement according to The Associated Press.

The child, now 2, lives with her father. Her eye condition reportedly improved with treatment but doctors say she suffers from permanent vision loss in her right eye.

Click here for more on this story from Q13 Fox.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/01/mom-accused-repeatedly-bleaching-toddler-eyes/#ixzz1tcImb3bV

Caleigh Harrison : Mom Has Told Conflicting Stories - Or The Media Has Told Conflicting Stories ?

1) The ball went into deeper water and the Mother went to get it, turned around and the girl was gone
2) The ball went over the fence towards nearby cottages and the Mother went to retreave it .

#BiancaJones:Bianca's Sister Testified -That morning, she said, her father carried a silent Bianca to the car, covered with a blanket.

FBI Martin Grime's cadaver dog MORSE hit on the childs seat in the car and a closet in the fathers home ...the case continues.

http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/the-mother-of-2-year-old-bianca-jones-will-take-the-stand-friday-in-case-against-dandre-lane

Bianca's 8-year-old sister testified last week that Lane hit her with the stick one time when she had wet the bed, and stuffed her soiled underwear under her tongue as punishment.

From The Detroit News:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...#ixzz1tdruy27c

The girlfriend did not want to show her face and was not anxious to cooperate with prosecutors but her testimony painted a chilling picture. She said she heard Bianca stop crying and never heard her again.

Missing Katelyn Markham : John Carter 911 Call

Please remember that not only children are victims of faked abductions by their parents . Adults also play the same game, they kill their partner, hide their body then claim they are missing!


Please review the principles of analysis of 911 calls.

Guilty callers often begin with a greeting, focus upon themselves and even skip asking for help for the victim.

http://www.fox19.com/story/15295662/police-release-911-call-reporting-katelyn-markhams-disappearance?redirected=true

Please note that Statement Analysis and Commentary is in bold type.  You can listen here to it at the foxnews link.  



John Carter: Hi, my name is John Carter, I am calling - I know that you're not supposed to report a missing person after - before 24 hours, but my fiancee is missing, I can't find her anywhere.


1.  "hi"   Please note the that call begins with a greeting.  Dr. Susan Adams, in her study of 911 calls of domestic homicide found that a call that begins with a greeting is more likely to be a guilty caller.  There were other aspects of her study including who the caller asks for help for:  himself, or the victim, for example. The guilty caller focuses upon his own self, rather than the victim, and may even disparage the victim. 

2.  Please note that there is no use of her name indicating a problem in the relationship. He says "my fiance" without using her name.  
911 Dispatcher: Okay, where'd you see her last?

J: Um, I saw her at like 12 o' clock last night. She stays in a house by herself, um, so, she - I'm just, I'm really nervous. Her car's still there, her purse is still -

The 911 operator should never interrupt. 
Please note the phrase, "I'm really nervous"; not just "nervous" but "really" nervous.  This is a focus upon the caller himself, not the victim.  Innocent callers focus upon the victim and ask for help, specifically, for the victim. 
D: Is there an address?

J: Yeah, 5214 Dorshire Drive.

D: 5214?

J: Dorshire, yes.

D: Okay. And you're out there now?

J: Um, I'm heading out there now, I, like, have been trying to get ahold of her and I decided to go by her house to see if she's okay, and her car's still there - she would be at work right now with her car. Which is why I'm like really freaking out.

1.  Note that the question, "you're there now?" is sensitive to John Carter who did not say "no", but avoiding answering it directly.  
2.  He is only going to "go by her house" and reports being in transit, rather than simply stating he is going there.  
3.  "to see" is the same as "because", indicating the need to tell why he is doing something rather than report what he is doing. 
4.  "and her car's still there";  is he there now, and can see that her car is still there, or is he just "heading out there" now?
5.  "I'm like really freaking out" now uses two words to modify "freaking out", making it very sensitive.  This should question if he really is "freaking out".  Again, note focus upon himself and his wellbeing. 


D: What's her name?

J: Katelyn Helene Markham.

D: Have you called the hospitals or jails or anything?

J: Um -

D: Where was she at midnight last night when you last saw her?

J: She was at her house. She was going to bed. She wasn't going out to do anything, so she would've been in her bed. And I mean, I've been with her for 6 years - she's not deceiving, you know, she doesn't -

What someone tells us in the negative is sensitive.  Here he has three things to tell us what she was not doing:  not going out "to do anything"; not deceiving, and doesn't, but stops himself or is interrupted. 

D: Okay, and you guys didn't have an argument or anything?

J: Not at all.

"Not at all" is not the simple "no"

D: Okay. Is she on any medications or anything?

J: Not at all.

D: Has she had thoughts of suicide or anything like that?

J: No. Never. I... never.
Broken sentence means missing information. 

D: All right. And have you talked to her mom or anybody like that, to see if maybe she's out shopping, or - ?

J: I called her father. The only thing that's not there is her cell phone, which is positive, but she's not answering it. So... and the Sacred Heart Festival is going on right up the street, and there's a lot of questionable people there, and it's just kind of. I'm sorry.
The question is answered, but then he goes beyond the question to talk about the Festival, casting suspicion towards those at it. 
Note "I'm sorry" is often found in the language of the guilty, no matter what its usage is.  See Casey Anthony 


D: Okay, well, we'll go ahead and have somebody meet you there. What kind of vehicle are you going to be in?

J: A 2008 Ford Docus. It's red.

D: Okay, we'll have somebody come out and speak with you, okay?

J: Okay, thank you.

D: Mmmhmm. Bye.

J: Okay. Bye.

Please note that he did not express concern for the victim. 
Please note that he did not ask for help for the victim. 
Please note that he went beyond the realm of the questions. 
Please note the greeting, and the phrase, "I'm sorry"

There is enough in this call, by itself, to be concerned that he may be responsible for her disappearance. 


http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/statement-analysis-john-carters-911.html

Missing Isabel Celis : Police Ask Parents To Speak Up.

Note the need for the police to go public in asking Isabel's parents to cry out for her.  
This is unnatural. 
It is likely that they are seeking information on Isabel's whereabouts via the leakage that would come from the parents' statements.  This is similar to the Baby Ayla case in which police went as far as publicly humiliating Ayla's father with phrases like "it doesn't pass the straight face test" and "they know more than they are saying..."
This case has not reached that point of contention...yet. 
Like Ayla, there was a 'honeymoon' phase where police privately urged DiPietro to polygraph, and patiently listened to him whine and say how 'emotionally incapable' he was (he was 'emotionally and intellectually incapable of telling the truth), but telling the press, he was "fully cooperating", with the sensitivity noted in the word "fully" only to later ramp up the pressure. 
In the Isabel case, the family got word to the media that, somehow, not crying out for Isabel was the result of coaching by police.  Police finally went public and said that this was not the case, but that we want them to speak out.  
Police said they encouraged the family to speak but only got the very short prepared statement, so they continued to encourage them to speak, but this did not work, so now:
They go public. 
This focuses more suspicion on the parents as it highlights the question:  Why would any parent not cry out for help for their kidnapped child, unless they knew the child wasn't kidnapped?
Expect tension to increase...more informationa at Statement Analysis

http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/police-publicly-ask-isabels-parents-to.html

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Caleigh Harrison : Video - Relatives Talk About Missing Toddler

#BiancaJones : Father Still Staying With His 'Abduction' Story

Martin Grime and his cadaver dog MORSE are involved in this case. Eddie and Keela , cadaver dogs also belonging to Grime picked up on the cadaver of the missing British child Madeleine McCann and her mother's clothing. Political interference prevented Madeleine ever receiving justice, the case today has been whitewashed by the very corrupt Scotland Yard run by Murdoch's News International. Criminal profiler Pat Brown tried to help find Madeleine, she profiled the case and placed it on Amazon Kindle the McCanns threatened her and banned the book, Pat is now suing the couple for defamation. 

Back to Bianca...

Friday was the second day of testimony in the preliminary examination of D’Andre Lane in the alleged murder of his 2-year-old daughter, Bianca Jones, in the 36th district court. The prosecution focused on child abuse allegedly visited upon Bianca by her father for wetting the bed.

Lane is sticking to his story that Bianca was kidnapped during an armed carjacking on the morning of December 2.

The prosecutor maintains that the carjacking story was invented to cover up the toddler’s death from child abuse. It claims Lane killed Bianca while punishing her for soiling her clothes.
Yesterday the prosecution called Anjali Lyons, Lane’s girlfriend at the time of the disappearance. Lyons told the court she awoke on the morning of the disappearance to hear the 2-year-old screaming and the sound of a wooden stick hitting bare flesh....read more

http://www.examiner.com/article/preliminary-examination-continues-friday-bianca-jones-murder-case